The decision follows the publishing of a number of high profile cases concerning employment tribunals
Following the highly publicised employment tribunal cases brought against Asda and Uber recently, Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service have made a new announcement, stating that all employment tribunal judgments will be placed online in the very near future.
The new online judgement publishing is set to come into force sometime at the start of the new year, 2017.
The announcement has been made following a number of high-profile cases, in which the judgement concerning the companies involved had been published. Both Asda and Uber were taken to employment tribunals over issues within the workplace and members of staff.
Claimants and lawyers will have complete online access, with the ability to look up employment tribunal judgments against a specific company and topic, making it much more accessible for all.
The online service will be free to use and searches will be available to read instantaneously. No former knowledge of a particular case will prevent the user from searching for a specific judgement.
Please click here for more information regarding our employment law services.
The two drivers claim Uber is acting unlawfully by not offering sick and holiday pay
Two drivers for the cab hire service Uber, have taken the company to a London employment tribunal, claiming they are acting unlawfully by not offering sick and holiday pay.
Around 2 million Londoners use Uber, which enables a customer to book and pay for a cab via a smartphone app.
The case revolves around whether the two UK drivers are considered workers, or as Uber contends, self-employed, as the two legal definitions grant different employment rights.
Uber workers do have rights similar to employees, they are protected from unlawful deductions, entitled to holiday pay and also might be entitled to sick pay.
For the company, it will be the first time they have had to deal with legal action in the UK, as to whether their Uber drivers are self-employed or workers.
Both cases are being brought by the law firm, Leigh Day, who are acting on behalf of the GMB Union and the outcome will decide an additional seventeen claims against the company.
The Union argues that Uber doesn’t make sure that their drivers are paid the minimum wage, or whether they receive holiday pay and that the drivers do not get the same rights as employees, claiming that they are classed as ‘partners’ instead.
The two drivers involved in this test case are named as Yaseen Aslam and James Farrar.
The company has always upheld that their drivers are self-employed, so can work as much, or as little, as they would like.
Mr Justin Bowden, national secretary of the GMB Union, who spoke to the BBC, said that the GMB Union wanted to make sure that Uber drivers were given the same employment rights as employees.
He added: “You either have employment laws that people have to follow or you don’t.”
In this particular case, the real argument is whether the UK drivers who earn money through the app, are employees or self-employed.
If the two drivers see a favourable outcome at the employment tribunal, this could lead to many more coming forward, something that could change the company’s dependence on those it regards as self-employed.
Please follow this link for more info about our employment law services.